The obligation to adhere to the rules of procedural fairness and natural justice do not apply to our organisation.

"We then asked the FFA why there was no appeals process, and were told that there is an appeals process.

"We questioned the validity of this statement given the banning orders that we have seen of our own supporters (and those of other active supporter groups) contain no information on this process or even contact information for the FFA to further discuss the notice.

"We then asked the FFA to provide details as to how fans could appeal their bans, we were told the following: “Anyone who feels that they have been unjustly banned can present evidence to their club who will, if the evidence is convincing, appeal on behalf of the fan.”

or...

Someone is lying and based on the responses from every party on the FFA and Security side of the debate in the last 5 days that has re-inforced that they are the law and no debate will be entered into then I have a theory on who that might be.  

It's almost like they don't think the supporters can read.